A parent asked me recently what
alternatives there are to rewards and punishments. "I have
found myself 'bargaining' with my 2-year-old to get him to do
things, mostly eat," she wrote. While she found consequences
and rewards "effective," she wondered if there are other
ways to handle these situations.
When I hear parents - or parenting experts - say that
consequences are effective, I often wonder what they mean by
"effective." In this context, I believe what we usually
mean is that we get compliance from children - they do what we
tell them to do - at least for a while. Although we might feel
some relief in the moment, I seriously doubt that compliance meets
our own - or our children's - long-term needs. Both the goal
(compliance) and the means (rewards and consequences) come at a
price. They not only involve fear, guilt, shame, or desire for
reward, but they are also often accompanied by anger or
resentment. And because rewards and consequences are extrinsic
motivations, we become dependent on them and lose touch with our intrinsic
motivation to meet our own and others' needs.1
I believe that human beings are more joyfully motivated by an
intrinsic desire to meet our own and other people's needs. This is
a key premise of the Nonviolent Communication2
parenting practice I embrace. Instead of focusing on authority and
discipline, NVC teaches that trusting relationships are built
through attentiveness to everyone's feelings and needs.3
In accordance with NVC philosophy, recurrent parenting
challenges can be addressed by paying as much attention as
possible to everyone's long-term needs. This may take more time in
the moment because it means going beyond the present problem and
remembering what matters to us most in the big picture. Yet it is
time I want to invest. I believe in the long run I will harvest
deeper connection, trust, and harmony in my family - and powerful
life-skills for my child. I believe that these are the goals that
most parents aspire to, and that they are sweeter than mere
compliance.
In practicing NVC in the conflict over eating with this
parent's young son, for example, I would begin with the premise
that some needs of his are not being met. Even with a pre-verbal
toddler or a child not used to NVC language, we can still discover
his needs.
Let's consider each one of NVC's three key approaches: giving
empathy to the child; expressing the parent's observations,
feelings, needs and requests; and giving oneself empathy. Used
individually or together, these options can help a parent and
child to connect and address both of their needs.
Empathy for the child
Empathy for another person opens the door to deeper
understanding and connection. When a child son pushes his food
away or says "No" to the food, we should not try to
change his actions. We can focus, instead, on how he might be
feeling and on the needs he is trying to meet. We can start by
guessing: Is he saying no to the food because he's trying to meet
his need for pleasure - i.e., he doesn't like the food? Is he
distracted by other things and so wants to meet a need to focus on
something more interesting to him? Is he annoyed because he needs
autonomy - to choose what and when to eat? Is he confused because
he needs trust in his ability to "hear his body" -
perhaps he is simply not hungry?
Having connected mentally with our child's needs, we can asking
him if any of these possibilities ring true. For example:
"Are you frustrated because you want food you enjoy
more?" "Are you distracted? You want to focus on your
play?" "Are you annoyed because you want to choose when
to eat?" "Are you frustrated that we're asking you to
eat when you aren't hungry?" We can simplify the language -
but keep in mind that most toddlers understand more than they can
speak, and that by including feelings and needs in your
vocabulary, you are teaching your son emotional literacy. Even if
your son doesn't reply, you may notice that your tone of voice and
body language have relaxed simply because you have connected with
his needs - and that a potential power struggle has been defused.
Then we can go on to the next step - determining if there are
strategies that could meet both our needs.
In giving empathy, it's important that our goal not be to get
our child to do what we want. It is a matter of letting go our own
agenda, without giving up on our underlying needs. Consider what,
if anything, you'd be willing to do differently to increase the
likelihood of meeting your son's needs. Integrating our child's
needs into our strategies could include changing the daily menu,
offering food somewhere in the house where your son can eat as he
plays, creating playful, colorful food together and eating it
while you're crafting it, and many more options. The strategy
doesn't matter as much as being attuned to both your own and your
child's needs. By attending to your child's underlying needs you
would also be attending to yours. There is ultimately no conflict
between your needs -you just have different strategies and
priorities at that moment.
Expressing Yourself
I take a "No" from my son as a reminder to make
connection with him a priority. Sometimes this means focusing on
understanding his needs, but other times it means paying close
attention to how I'm expressing mine. I often discover that I have
asked him to do something without talking about what needs of mine
I'm hoping to meet and how I'm feeling. I get locked into
repeatedly demanding that he do what I want! Yet my experience
shows that people are more open to considering one another when
they understand each other's underlying feelings and needs.
When your child won't eat, you might say: "When I see you
pushing the food on the table and not putting it in your mouth,
I'm worried because I'd like to help your body be strong and
healthy. Would you be willing to eat what's on your plate?"
The trick here is that, since most human beings have a huge need
for autonomy - especially when we fear our need for autonomy won't
be met - it's most likely that our child will say no! This is
precisely the reason that I wouldn't want to force him. I believe
that the more children hear demands, the less they want to do
what we ask. The result is that we both miss the joy of
cooperation and mutual consideration. Therefore, what we do with
the "no" is pivotal to building our child's trust in our
willingness to embrace both our needs and his. We may choose to
empathize with our child, or express our own feelings and needs
again. This time we might say: "I feel frustrated because I
need more ease and cooperation around meal times," or "I
feel confused and I'd like to understand what you would like
now."
Each expression in NVC ends with a request that usually begins,
"Would you be willing to….?" By asking for a reply, we
can continue the flow of dialogue about a problem. Yet I find that
often, parents repeat the same request no matter what feelings and
needs they express! That tells me that they are still very intent
on getting their child to do exactly what they want them to do.
The child will sense that and object more strenuously. So another
helpful focus for dealing with "no" is to pay attention
to the kinds of requests we're making. Are we repeating the
request to eat? Then likely our child hears this as a demand. See
if you can identify anything else that would also help meet your
needs and ask for that. For example, you might ask him if he'd be
willing to tell you when he'd like to eat - he might say
five minutes. Then you set a timer, and in five minutes you've met
his need for choice and he'll likely sit down to eat in good
spirits.
Self-empathy
Self-empathy in NVC means checking in with our own feelings and
needs. This may seem odd at first, but I have found it profoundly
effective at increasing self-connection and peace of mind. Just
taking a minute before reacting can reduce anger and prevent a
power struggle!
In the case of a child refusing to eat, self-empathy may sound
something like this: "Wow, I'm feeling so stressed out! I
want to be more relaxed. Plus I'm worried because I need
confidence that he's getting the nutrition his body needs. And I'm
so frustrated because I'd like cooperation around caring for his
health. I'm also troubled because I need to understand what's
going on for him - I really have no idea!" Once we inquire
with our hearts about our needs, we often discover a multitude of
needs and may feel overwhelmed. I believe this is temporary and
that our sense of self-connection and clarity about our needs
increases with time, making self-empathy a quick and satisfying
process. At that point, we can experience relief from stress,
tension and anger - even without changing anything about our
child's behavior! This in turn gives us greater freedom to work
with them to meet both our needs, rather than attempting to force
a change.
Having gotten clearer about our needs, we can consider what
we'd like to do. Each of our needs might be fulfilled through a
variety of different strategies. Could we empathize with our child
to try to understand what's going on for him? Could we express our
feelings, needs and requests to him? Could we consult with our
child's physician about whether to worry about how much he's
eating? Could we talk with our partner or friends about it? Read a
book about toddlers and eating? Give our child more choices about
what to eat? Play together with his food? Or perhaps something
else? Strategies that come from understanding all our needs are
more likely to meet those needs.
Self-empathy is often crucial because it helps us release our
insistence that our child do what we want. Then, whether we choose
to express our own feelings and needs or empathize with our
child's, we are more likely to contribute to connection.
Furthermore, through self-empathy we offer ourselves the gift of
understanding and connection that we lack so sorely in our daily
lives - a welcome, nurturing moment in which we can express and
meet our own needs.
Conflicts with children are challenging for parents for many
complex reasons, ranging from our own childhood experiences to the
stresses of daily life. The level of challenge leads us to want to
take quick action to resolve the situation. Yet I believe
parenting is not about quick fixes that get our children to do
what we want. I believe it is about working with our own and our
children's needs and staying in touch with the long-term view. We
are in a life-long relationship, and by focusing on connection and
on meeting everyone's needs, we build mutual trust and nurture our
collective ability to thrive as a family.