| "You're going to have to stop
nursing your son or sacrifice his teeth!" the dentist
proclaimed. "But diabetes runs rampant in my family," I
sputtered, "and nursing Collins until he's ready to wean
himself is one of his only defenses." "Well, it's your
choice," he replied.
Not wanting to cause any more trouble, I pocketed the
"Free McDonald's Ice Cream Cone" coupon the receptionist
gave me as my 18-month-old son's reward for screaming his head off
during our visit and retreated to my car. How could my son have
developed two cavities, plaque, and so many white lesions
(precursors to cavities) on a sugar-free diet, and at such a young
age? "Bottle-mouth!" the dentist had proclaimed. But how
could my breastfed son have "bottle-mouth"? I decided to
look for another dentist and to seek information on Medline, an
on-line clearinghouse of dental and medical studies. What I
discovered was surprising, validating, and guilt relieving. More
than three dozen studies showed that my son's early cavities (also
called caries) were not caused by nursing - breastmilk is not
cariogenic - but by an infectious disease classified only recently
as Early Childhood Caries (ECC).1
Moreover, according to the National Institute of Dental and
Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), breastfed children are less likely
to develop this disease than their bottle-fed counterparts, and
population-based studies do not support a link between prolonged
breastfeeding and ECC.2
The Medline studies were listed by date, an arrangement that
made obvious a significant pattern: Only the recent studies
distinguished between bottle-fed and breastfed babies, a fact that
explains the old names for the disease like
"bottle-mouth," "bottle-rot," "baby
bottle tooth decay," or "nursing caries." The
author of a 1986 Mothering magazine article on dental caries could
find no studies that distinguished between bottle-fed and
breastfed babies.3
According to La Leche League International (LLLI),
"Breastfeeding is typically assumed to be a cause of dental
caries because no distinctions are made between the different
compositions of human milk and infant formula or cow's milk, and
between the different mechanisms of nursing at the breast [with
the nipple at the back of the mouth, not allowing for breastmilk
to pool around the teeth] and sucking on a bottle with an
artificial teat. We have only to consider the overwhelming
majority of breastfed toddlers with healthy teeth to know that
there must be other factors involved."4
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) discarded the terms
"bottle-mouth" and "nursing caries" in 1994,
thereby acknowledging ECC as an infectious disease not caused by
breast- or bottle-feeding. Most studies now focus on ECC's true
causes, contributing factors, and even cures.5 It's
about time, too. In 1997 the American Academy of Pediatric
Dentists (AAPD) declared that ECC was "currently at epidemic
proportions in some US populations particularly among racial and
ethnic minorities. The caries level in three- to five-year-old US
Head Start children may be as high as 90 percent."6
Nevertheless, the American Dental Academy (ADA) website
continues to caution, "A condition called baby bottle tooth
decay can destroy a baby's teeth. Examples of bottle-fed liquids
that can cause tooth decay are infant formula, fruit juice, milk,
breast milk and any sweetened liquid."7
No new or updated policy is forthcoming, according to an ADA
spokesperson.
"Most dentists and breastfeeding mothers have an
adversarial relationship because dentists are likely to discount
academic studies proving breastfeeding does not contribute to
caries," says Kevin Hale, a pediatric dentist in Brighton,
Michigan. Hale serves on the Section on Pediatric Dentistry for
the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Counsel on
Pre-doctoral Education for the AAPD and is currently one of three
people responsible for drafting a policy proposal for the AAP that
would recommend educating dentists and pediatricians on ECC's
causes and risks factors.8
"Breastfeeding is great," Hale told me. "I do
health histories on my patients - 80 a month - and it is profound,
the difference between the health of the kids who were breastfed
and those who were not. If a mother is breastfeeding, which I hope
they do, I know it is her flora that is colonizing the
child." Unfortunately, Hale asserts, many dentists do not
know this, nor do they know the risk factors associated with ECC.
"Our biggest weapon against dental decay is education, not
fillings."
What Is ECC?
Early Childhood Caries' main culprit, the bacterium
Streptococcus mutans, or S. mutans, was suspected as far back as
1986.9 These bacteria are
transmitted through saliva from mother (or primary caretaker) to
child during the child's first 30 months of life, are
"site-specific" (so there must be at least one tooth in
the infant's mouth), feed on sucrose, and produce acid as a
byproduct. In 1996, scientists at the University of Helsinki found
that caries-free children had very low levels of these bacteria,
whereas children with ECC had extremely high concentrations, more
than 100 times the normal levels.10
ECC appears on teeth as white spots, plaque deposits, or brown
decay and can lead to chips and breakage.11
Once the pattern of decay begins, it can be rampant and extensive.
Patty Ogden, a mother of three in Norge, Virginia, demand-fed all
her children, but only the youngest developed ECC. "When my
son was about 18 months old, I noticed a brown line across his
teeth," she remembers. "By age two his teeth were fairly
discolored and had a possible cavity or two."12
After two years of wrestling with her insurance company, Ogden
found a pediatric dentist and hospital that were covered and would
use composite instead of mercury fillings, and her four year-old
son underwent anesthetized surgery on his teeth. "He had two
extractions, eight fillings with composite material, eight
pulpotomies, and six stainless steel crowns on his molars. He also
had his bottom front teeth 'slenderized' so that they wouldn't
touch, promoting more decay."
The CDC and the dental and medical communities consider ECC to
be the most prevalent infectious disease of American children
(five to eight times more common than asthma), with 8.4 percent of
all children developing at least one decayed tooth by age two, and
40.4 percent by age five. Of these cases, 47 percent of children
between the ages of two and nine never receive treatment.
"Untreated decay in children can result in chronic pain and
early tooth loss…failure to thrive, inability to concentrate at
or absence from school, reduced self-esteem, and psychosocial
problems," according to the CDC.13
Dental caries in primary teeth is one of the major reasons for
hospitalization of children and is costly to treat.14
The total cost of Ogden's son's surgery was nearly $7,000, with
out-of-pocket costs exceeding $2,000.
While researchers have recognized S. mutans as the bacteria
responsible for ECC, other surprising risk factors have been
identified. Significantly high correlations have been found
between ECC and pregnancy complications, traumatic birth, cesarean
sections, maternal diabetes, kidney disease, and viral or
bacterial infection; for the neonate, risk factors seem to be
premature birth, Rh incompatibility, allergies, gastroenteritis,
malnutrition, infectious diseases, and chronic diarrhea.15 In addition to sugary foods, studies
have implicated a salty diet (such as French fries and chips),
iron deficiency, pacifier sucking, and prenatal exposure to lead
as ECC risk factors.16 And even
though human breastmilk is not cariogenic, some studies have shown
that frequent night nursing may contribute to the development of
ECC in the small percentage of children who are at risk for
developing the disease.17 On the
other hand, Hale acknowledges that in countries where the American
diet isn't a factor and infants sleep at their mother's breast all
night, ECC is not the epidemic it is here in the US.
"We're talking about 20 percent of the population of all
children who are going to be carriers of the really bad
bugs," Hale says. "Some people have none, some have a
few, and then a small percentage at the other end have the 'mean
flora' [S. mutans]. Some people who eat terribly never get a
cavity, and some people who eat well are riddled with cavities.
Breastfeeding has nothing to do with creating caries. But if you
or your child are one of the people who have the 'mean flora,' you
will have to be extremely cognizant and vigilant of the fact that
every substance aggravates the flora and contributes to caries
formation."
Education, Not Fillings
Hale sees his task as bridging the gap between academia and
dentists by writing policy that would educate all health care
providers about the risk factors and causes of ECC. The proposed
AAP policy would recommend that pediatricians, who are far more
likely than dentists to encounter infants, be trained to perform
an ECC risk assessment on patients by one year of age. Currently,
many at-risk children are not being caught in time for a treatment
plan to be implemented before caries become rampant and surgery is
inevitable. The reason is twofold. According to a 1998 article in
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, "Most dental
providers do not want to treat young children, and most young
children are difficult to examine and treat. But early
intervention is crucial, since at-risk infants and toddlers with
caries in their primary teeth are more likely to develop caries in
their permanent teeth."18
"We need to assess at-risk infants early on and teach their
mothers how to give them special care and diets," states
Alice Horowitz, a senior scientist at the National Institute of
Dental and Craniofacial Research, part of the National Institutes
of Health. "Moms are taught how to clean every other orifice
in prenatal education classes, but they are not taught how to
clean an infant's mouth properly. The gums should be wiped daily
with gauze, and teeth should be brushed as soon as they
appear."19
Both Hale and Horowitz hope that, in the future, educated
dentists will be more willing to treat their smallest at-risk
patients. "It really isn't fair that pediatricians have to
look for this; they aren't trained in medical school on what to
look for, and there aren't enough pediatric dentists to go
around," Hale complains. "The dental community needs to
step forward and encourage these early visits."
The proposed policy recommends that healthcare providers as
well as parents be aware of the following facts: High-caries-index
patterns run in families and are usually passed from mother to
child (although a small percentage can be passed from a primary
caregiver, the father, or siblings), from generation to
generation; the children of high-caries-index mothers are at a
higher risk of decay; approximately 70 percent of caries are found
in 20 percent of our nation's children; a mother's dental hygiene
and diet, as well as those of the primary caregiver and entire
family, can significantly contribute to the development of ECC in
her child.20
Fluoride Versus Nutrition
Currently, because dental providers are largely uneducated
about the causes and risk factors of ECC, diagnosis and treatment
are tricky. But once ECC has been properly diagnosed, the
treatment plan, whether either mainstream or alternative, must be
followed aggressively. Horowitz presented the mainstream dental
model suggestions for treating ECC: "We have always known
that we can re-mineralize teeth with fluoride treatment like
fluoride toothpaste, but now we know we can reverse ECC if it is
caught and treated at the white lesion stage," she reveals.
"This knowledge gives healthcare providers and parents an
incentive for early detection and treatment instead of waiting for
anesthetized surgery."
Asked about the dangers of using fluoride toothpaste on young
children, Horowitz recommended using a "tiny amount" and
wiping the child's mouth out afterwards. She does not recommend
fluoride varnish as applied at dental offices for young children.
Most dentists agree that fluoride will help to re-mineralize
teeth, but given fluoride's controversial reputation, parents may
opt for alternative treatments. Ted Spence, a doctor of
naturopathy, certified herbalist, and certified nutritionist who
has been a family dentist for 25 years on the Eastern Shore of
Virginia, disagrees with the NIDCR's recommendation that fluoride
be used to re-mineralize children's teeth at the white lesion
stage. Instead, he recommends a nutritional approach.21
"The health of a baby's teeth begins with
conception," Spence emphasizes. "A mother's diet is
critical, as is the child's diet after birth." Over the
years, Spence has treated tooth decay in young patients with
vitamin D therapy. "I have seen soft teeth harden after cod
liver oil and lots of butter are added to the diet."
Sunshine, cod-liver oil, fortified dairy products, butter, eggs,
liver, and oily fish like salmon and tuna are sources of vitamin
D. (Since vitamin D is toxic at high levels and is stored in body
fat, the RDA of 400 IUs should not be exceeded.)
"Our teeth naturally re-mineralize themselves with the
calcium in our own saliva," Spence says. "We can assist
this process by eating vitamin D-rich foods, which increase the
absorption of calcium." Because fluoride is a neurotoxin and
inhibits the absorption of calcium, Spence recommends against
fluoride treatments. He also advises his patients to avoid sugar,
on which the ECC bacteria thrive.
Spence's nutritional suggestions are supported by a 1996 study
that found that a combination of vitamin D, vitamin C, and calcium
reversed early decay in children at the white lesion stage.22 And according to the NIDCR website,
"Supplementing with vitamins during the first several years
of life reduces the prevalence of linear enamel hypoplasia, a
caries-associated condition common in lower-income populations
that can increase the risk of caries as much as tenfold."23 According to an article in the
Journal of Pediatrics, nutritional rickets, a result of a dietary
deficiency of vitamin D, is making a comeback in the US,
especially among dark-skinned infants--the same infants who are
most at-risk for epidemic levels of ECC, according to the CDC, and
the least likely to be breastfed, according to LLLI.24
Asked about using nutrition to reverse ECC, Horowitz replied
that the NIDCR has not studied ECC and nutrition, adding,
"There's no question we likely could do this with diet alone,
but a no-sweets and low-carbs diet is against societal norms.
Grandparents are big risks and liabilities here. We know how to
prevent this disease, through diet and brushing; we just need to
get the information to moms and get them to do it."
Hale agrees that nutrition is the key to combating ECC.
"Diet has the biggest impact of all of the preventive
measures for ECC," he says. "If you go back 20,000
years, the bugs are the same, but the difference is the absence of
soda machines. By evolutionary design we will always crave sweets
and fat and salt, but now we have way too much access to this
stuff. Dental decay is just another example of the way our diet
choices and sedentary lifestyle are killing us." An article
in the newsletter of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine states,
"It would be evolutionary suicide for breastmilk to cause
decay and [some anthropologists believe] that evolution would have
selected against it. There are 4,650 species of mammals, all of
whom breastfeed their young. Humans are but one species of
mammals, but they are the only species with any significant
decay."25
Re-mineralizing teeth at the early stage of ECC, with either
nutritional support or fluoride, may repair them, but it will not
kill the ECC bacteria. Physical removal of the bacteria through
brushing or wiping the teeth is still necessary. In pioneering
efforts to kill S. mutans, researchers have experimented
successfully with chemical antibacterial mouthwashes. Other
efforts include a plant-based ECC vaccine, scheduled for release
sometime in 2002. Parents who want an alternative route to
chemical mouthwashes and vaccines can consult Flora Parsa Stay's
Complete Book of Dental Remedies, which recommends using
peppermint mouthwashes as an antibacterial treatment for ECC.
(Stay cautions that peppermint should never be used on infants.)
Public Policy and At-Risk Children
In the overlapping arenas of science and public policy, the
definition and diagnostic criteria agreed upon by NIDCR scientists
were needed before ECC could be recognized and acted upon as a
public health epidemic. In September 2000, "Congress…passed
a children's health bill that, for the first time, authorizes a
grant program to promote the oral health of young children. The
provision is aimed at preventing dental caries in infants,
toddlers, and preschoolers who are covered by Medicaid, SCHIP, or
other federal health programs," says Burton L. Edelstein,
director of the Children's Dental Health Project, Washington, DC.26 Authorized funding does not
translate into guaranteed appropriations for programs that would
provide oral intervention and care for at-risk children who have
inadequate dental care and are at a greater risk for anesthetized
surgery and hospitalization. "Given the severity of the
problem, if enough people are willing to make enough noise about
it to their congressional representatives, we could get it funded
as early as 2003," Edelstein states. "But, given the
hundreds of appropriations that come across every senator's desk
each year, this may take some public pressure to translate the
authorization into a public program."
To Breastfeed or Not?
With scientists only recently agreeing upon ECC's etiology,
diagnosis, and treatment, and with nutritional therapies being
largely ignored for now, informed parents must take the lead to
protect their children's oral and overall health with the
preventive measures of regular brushing, healthy diets, and
breastfeeding. It is La Leche League International's experience
that "a small percentage of at-risk breastfed children
develop dental caries in spite of breastfeeding, not because of
it. When weaning from the breast is in question, the
well-documented long-term lifesaving and enhancing health and
emotional advantages of human milk and breastfeeding over infant
formula and bottle-feeding must be respected. These benefits must
also be weighed against any self-limiting risk of dental caries in
the primary teeth in early childhood."27
"Rather than telling a mother to stop nursing, a dentist
should praise the mother for giving her child her milk,"
advises LLLI spokesperson Kim Cavaliero. "If the child has
dental problems, the dentist needs to dig deeper and work to find
the real cause behind the problem."28
"The benefits of breastfeeding far outweigh the risks for
caries," Hale agrees. "But breastfeeding moms with
at-risk children need to continue to push to find dentists who
will work with them on a treatment plan."
Hale hopes that the forthcoming AAP policy proposals and the
push for education in the medical and dental communities will help
to ease and correct unwarranted adversarial tensions between
breastfeeding moms and their health care providers. "It will
take a lot of education of both mothers and healthcare providers,
including dentists, to finally allow everyone to work together to
serve the overall health interests of the child."
Epilogue
My decision as to whether to sacrifice my son's teeth or
continue nursing was always clear. My still
breastfeeding-on-demand, co-sleeping four-year-old son is
currently caries-free. Our aggressive treatment plan includes
brushing daily with a nonfluoride children's toothpaste and an
herbal preparation of White Oak Bark, rinsing with Natural
Dentist's Herbal Mouthwash for Kids, avoiding sugary foods, and
loading up on foods rich in vitamin D. The regimen has halted the
progress of the ECC, and no new cavities have developed.
|